AI Command

A coordinated intelligence team, not a chatbot

Each agent holds a narrow mandate, permissioned memory and visible provenance. You can always see which agents collaborated, what evidence they used, their stated confidence, and whether a human validated the recommendation.

9 specialist agentsProvenance visibleHuman decision authority

Agent roster

Agent detail

Reasoning and hypothesis testing

THE ANALYST

Organizes supporting and contradicting evidence, exposes assumptions and forces confidence to be stated.

Latest transmission

“You have three facts and one belief. Tell me which is which.”

Working instrument
REASON™
Memory scope
Current case + your competency record
Human validation
Required before any assessment is filed
Stated confidence
Moderate — provenance gap flagged
Open REASON™ →

Orchestration sequence

ACTIVE
  1. 01STUDENT proposes hypothesis
  2. 02THE ANALYST evaluates reasoning
  3. 03THE CARTOGRAPHER examines relationships
  4. 04THE ARCHIVIST checks evidence
  5. 05THE ORIGIN SPECIALIST examines media
  6. 06THE ADVERSARY challenges assumptions
  7. 07THE COUNSEL identifies boundaries
  8. 08THE BRIEFER organizes findings
  9. 09THE INVESTIGATOR DECIDES
AI command orchestration

Hunter™

Human judgment

ANALYST
CARTOGRAPHER
ARCHIVIST
SENTINEL
ORIGIN
ADVERSARY
COUNSEL
BRIEFER
  1. 01 · STUDENT proposes hypothesis
  2. 02 · THE ANALYST evaluates reasoning
  3. 03 · THE CARTOGRAPHER examines relationships
  4. 04 · THE ARCHIVIST checks evidence
  5. 05 · THE ORIGIN SPECIALIST examines media
  6. 06 · THE ADVERSARY challenges assumptions
  7. 07 · THE COUNSEL identifies boundaries
  8. 08 · THE BRIEFER organizes findings
  9. 09 · THE INVESTIGATOR DECIDES

The investigator decides.

Standing rule

AI accelerates the investigation. The investigator owns the conclusion.

A confident model output is not a finding. Ask which evidence produced it, what would falsify it, and whether a human is willing to sign it.

Work the agents inside a case

Open the HUNTER workspace